68 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1217, 67 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43,838, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7279, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,421 Ernest Brazil v. United States Department of the Navy, and Secretary of the Navy

66 F.3d 193 68 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1217 , 67 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43,838 , 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7279 , 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12 ,421 Ernest BRAZIL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of the NAVY, and Secretary of the Navy, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16615. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 14, 1995. Decided Sept. 15, 1995. Vickie L. Henry, Crosby, Heafey, Roach & May, Oakland, CA, for plaintiff-appellant. E. Roy Hawkens, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before SNEED, CANBY, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. CANBY, Circuit Judge: 1 In this case we must decide whether a federal court may, in the context of a Title VII discrimination case, review the Executive's decision to revoke a security clearance or the equivalent thereof. We conclude that the court lacks jurisdiction to conduct such a review, and we therefore affirm the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the Department of the Navy. FACTS AND PROCEDURE 2 Mr. Ernest Brazil was a civilian employee of the United States Navy's…