United States v. Cal-Almond Inc.

Good Law
102 F.3d 999·96 Daily Journal DAR 15229·1996 WL 727007·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 33125·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9220
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 19, 1996Nos. 95-17209, 95-17333California2,526 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wiggins, J.

The United States appeals the district court’s order denying a preliminary injunction requesting enforcement of an almond marketing order promulgated by the Secretary of Agriculture pursuant to the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 (“the Act”). See 7 U.S.C. § 608c. The government also appeals the district court’s order requiring the Almond Board to place Appellee Cal-Almond’s payment of assessments for the 1992-93 and 1993-94 season into escrow. We have jurisdiction over these timely appeals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a)(1) and we AFFIRM.

I.

In Cal-Almond, Inc. v. United States Department of Agriculture, 14 F.3d 429 (9th Cir.1993) (“Cal-Almond I ”), we held that the Almond Board’s advertising and promotion program for the 1980-81 through 1990-91 seasons violated the First Amendment rights of the almond handlers. Subsequently, we held that the handlers were entitled to a refund of all advertising and promotion assessments paid to the Almond Board or escrowed during the pendency of the administrative petition proceedings. Cal-Almond, Inc. v. United States Department of Agriculture, 67 F.3d 874 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 72 , 136 L.Ed.2d 32…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.