Marks

Marks v. Clarke

Good Law
102 F.3d 1012·96 Daily Journal DAR 15215·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 33121·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1350
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 19, 1996Nos. 93-36092 to 93-36094, 94-35251 to 94-35253 and 94-35372California14,236 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Reinhardt, J.

Appellants in this case are twenty-three individual City of Spokane police officers 1 and one individual Spokane County law enforcement officer. 2 Appellees, the plaintiff Gypsy Church of the Northwest and the twenty-six individual plaintiffs in district court cases Marks v. City of Spokane and Gypsy Church v. Spokane County, filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in June 1989 alleging that three years earlier, in 1986, appellants and the City of Spokane and Spokane County (the “municipalities”) 3 violated their Fourth Amendment rights by unreasonably seeking and unreasonably executing a warrant to search two residences and all the persons present at those residences. On this appeal, appellants challenge four orders of the district court in which that court initially denied all but two of the appellants.qualified immunity, certified the interlocutory appeal of its qualified immunity determination as “frivolous” and retained jurisdiction over the proceedings, denied the remaining two appellants qualified immunity and granted partial summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. At that point it deemed the qualified immunity appeals no longer frivolous.

Appellants filed their' first…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.