UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terry Norman TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellant

Good Law
66 F.3d 254·95 Daily Journal DAR 12841·1995 WL 571863·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 27318·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7510
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 26, 199593-30434California553 words

Opinion

Opinion

Terry N. Taylor appeals his conviction of five counts of filing false claims against the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 287 , and one count of making false statements in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm, in part, and vacate and remand, in part.

Taylor contends that the district court erred by refusing to submit materiality, an essential element of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 , to the jury. This contention has merit.

Section 1001 makes it a crime knowingly and willfully to falsify, conceal or cover up a material fact in any matter within the jurisdiction of the United States. In United States v. Gaudin, 28 F.3d 943 (9th Cir.1994), affd, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 2310 , 132 L.Ed.2d 444 (1995), we reaffirmed the law of the circuit “that when the element of materiality requires a factual finding, as it does in section 1001 prosecutions, that element must be submitted to the jury.” Id. at 951. We held, furthermore, that a district court’s determination of materiality as a matter of law in an 18 U.S.C. § 1001 prosecution is reversible error. Id.

Here, the district court stated that it did not believe that materiality was an element…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.