Aizawa

Pasatiempo ex rel. Pasatiempo v. Aizawa

Good Law
103 F.3d 796
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 19, 1996No. 94-17092California4,818 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nelson, J.

Appellants Ramsey Pasatiempo, Peter Ferreira, and Tina Williams, on behalf of themselves and a class of similarly situated individuals (“Parents and Students”), appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellee Department of Education of the State of Hawaii (“DOE”). Parent's- arid Students maintain that in administering individual evaluations of students without comporting with the procedural requirements of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1485 (“IDEA”) and the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794 (“Section 504”), the DOE violated federal law. 1 We have jurisdiction over this appeal, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we reverse.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

I. Statutory and Regulatory Background

The IDEA requires that all students with disabilities be “identified, located, and evaluated,” 20 U.S.C. § 1412 (2)(C), and that then-parents be notified when a school district intends to evaluate them for special education, 20 U.S.C. § 1415 (b)(1)(C). In order to comply with these statutory mandates, the DOE adopted Haw.Admin.R.Chap. 36 (“Chapter 36”), the goal of which is to guarantee procedural protections to students and their…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.