Villegas-Valenzuela

Villegas-Valenzuela v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Good Law
103 F.3d 805·97 Daily Journal DAR 352·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 33219·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9290
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 20, 1996Nos. 95-70767, 95-70841California4,394 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Trott, J.

Ana Villegas-Valenzuela and Martina Limon-Perez petition to overturn decisions of administrative law judges granting summary decisions in favor of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) in two separate civil document fraud proceedings seeking civil money penalties under the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1324c(a)(2). We must consider whether employees violate section 1324c(a) by using false immigration documents to prove to their employers that they are eligible for employment. Because we conclude that such use of false documents by employees violates the statute, we dismiss the petitions.

I. BACKGROUND

A. The Statutory Framework

In 1986, Congress enacted the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (“IRCA”), Pub.L. No. 99-603, 100 Stat. 3359 (1986) (codified in scattered sections of 8 U.S.C.), which amended the INA and, among other things, made it unlawful for an employer knowingly to hire an alien who is unáuthorized to work in the United States. Id. § 1324a. The statute creates an employment-eligibility verification system. Under this system, an employer- must execute a verification form (“1-9”), attesting under penalty of perjury, that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.