Gardner

Gardner v. Stager

Good Law
103 F.3d 886·96 Daily Journal DAR 15492·1996 WL 734760·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 33534·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9428
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 26, 1996No. 95-16471California969 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Choy, J.

Cliff and Bertha Gardner (“Gardners”) appeal from the district court’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 12 dismissal of their quiet title action for grazing rights on land located in the Humboldt National Forest. We affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

Cliff and Bertha Gardner own a cattle ranch in the Ruby Valley, Elko County, Nevada. The ranch is near the Humboldt National Forest. The Gardners and their predecessors in interest have grazed livestock on the federal forest land for many years.

Gardners how seek to quiet title to the right to graze cattle and to certain water rights on the Dawley Creek Allotment, which is part of the Humboldt National Forest. Gardners filed this action in Nevada state court on October 24, 1994. The complaint names several federal officials, including the forest supervisor for the Humboldt National Forest, and certain officials of the state of Nevada, but does not name the United States as a defendant. On December 1, 1994, the United States, as the real party in interest, filed a notice of removal with the Nevada state court, and the case was removed to the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. 1 Rodney Harris and D. Waive Stager, two of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.