Joseph Rosenbaum, M.D., Inc. v. Hartford Fire Insurance

Good Law
104 F.3d 258·96 D.A.R. 15·96 Daily Journal DAR 15545·20 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2321·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 33637
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 27, 1996No. 94-55579California2,125 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kleinfeld, J.

This case deals with the scope of an employee dishonesty bond issued to an Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) plan. The district court granted summary judgment on the grounds that there was a concealment that would void the coverage. We affirm, but on different grounds.

FACTS

Dr. Joseph Rosenbaum established a pension plan for his professional corporation, naming his wife and himself as trustees. He and a firm called California Pension Administrators and Consultants, Inc., were administrators of the plan. Evidently, California Pension Administrators and Consultants only managed the paperwork. The authority to manage and invest the plan’s money resided with Dr. and Mrs. Rosenbaum as trustees.

*260 During the time periods relevant to this case, Dr. Rosenbaum caused some hundreds of thousands of dollars of plan money to be invested in second mortgages in California residential real estate. More precisely, the money was invested through Property Mortgage Company, Inc., managed by a man named Stanley Glickman, in fractional shares of second deeds of trust. The investment scheme called for Mr. Glickman to assign to investors fractional shares of notes and deeds of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.