Calderon

Calderon v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

Good Law
107 F.3d 756·97 Daily Journal DAR 1821·1997 WL 71765·1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 3045·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1229
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 21, 1997No. 94-70565California3,203 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wiggins, J.

OVERVIEW

Arthur Calderon, warden of the California State Prison at San Quentin, and Daniel Lun-gren, attorney general of California, (hereinafter “the State”) petition for writ of mandamus and move to stay the district court’s orders relating to the availability of investigative and expert funds under the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. § 848 (q)(9), for death row inmate Patrick Bruce Gordon, the real party in interest. The State requests that we exercise our supervisory mandamus authority to prohibit the district court from approving federal funds for Gordon under section 848(q)(9), where the funds would be used to investigate unexhausted claims that must be pursued in state court before they may be included in the federal habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1651 .

We hold that the district court could properly consider a request for funds under 21 U.S.C. § 848 (q)(9) even though no habeas *-826 petition was pending after November 15, 1994. Because the district court properly dismissed the mixed habeas petition on November 15, we find moot the State’s contention that the earlier stay of the habeas proceedings precluded the district court from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.