McDowell

McDowell v. Calderon

Caution
107 F.3d 1351·97 Daily Journal DAR 2002·1997 WL 78453·46 Fed. R. Serv. 749·1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 3422
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 26, 1997No. 96-99000California2,588 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Thompson, J.

In 1984, a jury in California found Charles E. McDowell, Jr., guilty of murder, attempted murder, attempted rape, and burglary. The jury found true the special circumstances of felony murder/burglary and felony murder/rape. McDowell was sentenced to death.

After exhausting his claims for relief in state court, McDowell filed his first amended petition for federal habeas relief in the district court. This is an appeal from the denial of that petition. In the petition, McDowell argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel during the guilt phase of his trial and asserts several errors occurred during the penalty phase. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 , and we affirm.

FACTS

On May 20, 1982, Paula Rodriguez was working as a house cleaner at the Bardsley residence. At that time, McDowell was living with his companion, Lea D’Crenza, in the same neighborhood. At approximately 1:00 p.m., neighbors heard screams coming from the Bardsley residence. Theodore and Dolores Sum telephoned the Bardsleys. They heard more screams through the telephone and then it was "disconnected.

The Sums went to the Bardsley home to investigate. Theodore Sum opened the front door and saw a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.