Hines

Hines v. Gomez

Caution
108 F.3d 265·97 Daily Journal DAR 3262·1997 WL 101101·1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 4017·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1731
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 7, 1997Nos. 95-17259, 95-17260California2,026 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Lay, J.

*267 OPINION

Gary Dale Hines, a death row inmate, brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various prison officials employed by the San Quentin State Prison in California. Hines alleges, inter alia, that Steven Pearson, a prison guard, falsely charged him with a rule violation and that Stephen Szmaciarz, a hearing officer, falsely found Hines guilty of the infraction. Hines maintains that both officials acted in retaliation for his prior use of the prison grievance system. 1 The parties agreed to try the case before a magistrate judge. A jury found for Hines against Pearson and Szmaciarz. 2 The magistrate judge then granted Szmaciarz’s post verdict motion for judgment as a matter of law but denied Pearson’s post trial motions. Pearson appeals the magistrate judge’s post trial decision and Hines cross-appeals the grant of Szmaciarz’s motion. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

On January 19, 1992, Officer Pearson was escorting Hines back to his cell after Hines had his morning shower. Hines wore only his boxer shorts with his hands cuffed behind his back. Pearson was holding the very short chain that connected the cuffs. Nonetheless, Pearson reported Hines stopped tó receive some…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.