Kirk

Indian Oasis-Baboquivari UniFied School District No. 40 v. Kirk

Good Law
109 F.3d 634
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 25, 1997No. 93-16089California478 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wiggins, J.

Two public school districts and several students and their parents brought this action against Arizona’s Superintendent of Public Instruction and several local officials. The plaintiffs challenged an Arizona statute requiring county treasurers to pay a portion of a school district’s ending cash balance to a state fund used for equalization of funds among school districts. The plaintiffs sought declaratory and injunctive relief holding that the Arizona law violates both the Federal Impact Aid Law, 20 U.S.C. §§ 236-44 , and the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution.

On defendants’ motion to dismiss, the district court held that the school districts lacked standing to sue the State of Arizona in federal court because the districts are political subdivisions of the state. The district court also concluded that the students failed to allege distinct injury which was not derivative of the injury alleged by the school districts. As a result, the district court dismissed the school districts’ claims with prejudice. Then, in a separate paragraph, the district court dismissed the claims of the students and their parents without prejudice and with leave to file an amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.