American Rivers v. National Marine Fisheries Service

Good Law
109 F.3d 1484·1997 WL 149314
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 2, 1997No. 95-35462California4,531 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Ferguson, J.

Environmental and commercial fishing organizations 1 (collectively “American Rivers”), appeal the district court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment and its grant of defendants’ cross-motion for summary judgment. The defendants are the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) and the federal agencies 2 that operate the Federal Columbia River Power System (“River Power System”). American Rivers contends that the federal agencies violated § 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1536 (a)(2), because the operation of the River Power System jeopardizes the existence of the Snake River salmon and adversely modifies the salmon’s critical habitat. Specifically, American Rivers challenges the federal agencies’ decision to use transportation measures-moving juvenile salmon downstream in trucks and barges-to avoid a determination that the operation of the River Power System jeopardizes the existence of the salmon.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Factual Background

1. Basic Facts

“Salmon and hydropower are the two great natural resources of the Columbia River Basin.” Northwest Resource Info. Ctr., Inc. v. Northwest Power Planning Council, 35 F.3d 1371 , 1375 (9th Cir.1994),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.