United States v. 0.59 Acres of Land

Good Law
109 F.3d 1493·97 Daily Journal DAR 4443·1997 WL 152768·46 Fed. R. Serv. 1122·1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 6228
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 3, 1997Nos. 95-16582, 95-16601California1,695 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Roney, J.

The landowners appeal a judgment awarding them less compensation than claimed for the Government’s declaration of easements over two separate tracts of land. A Government expert’s appraisal report was put before the jury with several pieces of inadmissible evidence attached. Because this rendered the trial unfair to the defendant landowners, we reverse.

In March 1992, the United States filed complaints and declarations of taking on behalf of the Bureau of Reclamation to acquire permanent easements over a 33.31-acre tract of land owned by Frank and Verne Gee (Gee tract) and a 3.94-aere tract owned by Jack Sheaffer and John Low (Sheaffer tract). The easements were part of the construction of a high-voltage power line needed to operate pumping equipment for the Central Arizona Project (CAP), a 300-mile-long water delivery project transporting Colorado River water to central and southeastern portions of Arizona. The easements were a 10-foot strip across the Gee tract comprising 0.59 acres and a 25-foot strip across the Sheaffer tract comprising 0.46 acres. The condemnation cases for the two tracts were consolidated for trial.

The Government offered into evidence the 106-page and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.