Lumpkin

Lumpkin v. Brown

Good Law
109 F.3d 1498·97 Daily Journal DAR 4445·1997 WL 152778·70 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,585·73 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 895
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 3, 1997No. 95-15006California1,643 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Norris, J.

In 1993, the City of San Francisco removed Reverend Eugene Lumpkin from his position as a member of the San Francisco Human Rights Commission because of public statements he made condemning homosexuality. The statements cited by the City in removing Reverend Lumpkin included the following:

In removing Reverend Lumpkin from office, then-Mayor Frank Jordan stated:

CR 29, exh. H.

Mayor Jordan’s action was backed by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, which resolved that:

CR 23, Exh. C at 2.

Reverend Lumpkin sued the Mayor and the City, claiming that his removal from the Human Rights Commission violated his rights under the First Amendment and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb-l. The district court granted defendants summary judgment on the ground that the City’s action was fully justified because Reverend Lumpkin’s public statements were inconsistent with his “broad responsibilities for formulating, implementing and explaining [the] policy” of the Human Rights Commission, Order at 9, 14, and because his dismissal did not constitute governmental establishment of religion. Order at 17.

We agree with the district court that neither the First…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.