Banks

Aqua-Marine Constructors, Inc. v. Banks

Good Law
110 F.3d 663·1997 WL 138869
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 28, 1997No. 95-36021California7,551 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Reed, J.

Introduction

Polaris Insurance Company appeals the order of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of Aqua-Marine Constructors, in Aqua-Marine’s action against Polaris on a surety bond executed by Michael Banks and Polaris in favor of Aqua-Marine.

I. Facts

Aqua-Marine Constructors, an Oregon corporation, owns an oceangoing barge, the “Aqua 242.” In May 1992 Aqua-Marine entered into a bareboat charter agreement with Michael Banks, a resident of California. Under the terms of the charter party, Banks was to take possession of the barge at Everett, Washington, make monthly charter hire payments in the amount of $24,000.00, and redeliver the barge to Aqua-Marine at Everett. The charter party obligated Banks to at least three months’ hire, and further required him to obtain a bond securing the payment of the charter hire and the proper redelivery of the barge at the termination of the charter period. 1 Banks did obtain a performance bond which he and Polaris Insurance Company executed on May 15, 1992, in favor of Aqua-Marine. 2 Polaris is an insurance carrier incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Costa Rica.

By the beginning of August 1992, Banks was in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.