Cort

Cort v. Crabtree

Good Law
113 F.3d 1081·97 Daily Journal DAR 6363·1997 WL 256699·1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 11619·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3735
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 1997Nos. 96-36226, 96-36228, 96-36231California3,356 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Reinhardt, J.

Appellants Simon Cort, Don Martin, and Barry Sullenger are federal prisoners *1082 serving sentences for unarmed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a). The Bureau of Prisons initially determined that they were statutorily eligible for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3621 (e)(2)(B), which authorizes it to grant a sentence reduction of up to one year to prisoners convicted of “nonviolent offenses” who complete a substance abuse treatment program. Before appellants had completed the treatment program, the Bureau altered its interpretation of “nonviolent offenses” for purposes of § 3621(e)(2)(B) and, relying upon its new interpretation, informed appellants that they were no longer eligible for a sentence reduction on the ground that they had been convicted of a crime of violence. We hold that the Bureau erred in applying its new interpretation of § 3621(e)(2)(B) retroactively, and that appellants are therefore eligible for discretionary sentence reduction.

BACKGROUND

In 1990, Congress enacted amendments to 18 U.S.C. § 3621 requiring the Bureau of Prisons to give every federal prisoner with a substance abuse problem the opportunity to participate in a treatment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.