Jacks

Jacks v. Crabtree

Good Law
114 F.3d 983·97 Daily Journal DAR 7367·1997 WL 309962·1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 13691·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4411
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 11, 1997Nos. 97-35029, 97-35030, 97-35039, 97-35111California1,445 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kozinski, J.

We decide whether the United States Bureau of Prisons (the Bureau) may deny an inmate who has completed a drug treatment program a one-year sentence reduction because of his prior conviction for a violent crime.

I

Under the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, 18 U.S.C. § 3621 (e)(2)(B), a prisoner who is convicted of a nonviolent offense and completes a required drug treatment program may be eligible for a one-year sentence reduction. All four petitioners here met the statutory criteria: They completed the required program and are currently serving sentences for nonviolent offenses-two for drug dealing, one for being a felon in possession and one for possession of stolen bank funds.

The Bureau, however, ruled them ineligible for the one-year reduction pursuant to the following regulation:

28 C.F.R. § 550.58 . Each petitioner has a prior conviction for one of the specified crimes.

Petitioners sought writs of habeas corpus, challenging the Bureau’s regulation as violating the enabling statute, 18 U.S.C. § 3621 (e)(2)(B), and their due process rights. The district court rejected their claims and petitioners appealed.

II

Petitioners argue that section 550.58…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.