Cohen

Cohen v. Stratosphere Corp.

Good Law
115 F.3d 695·97 Daily Journal DAR 7165·1997 WL 298373·1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 13180·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4281
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 6, 1997No. 95-16098California3,869 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Canby, J.

Harvey Cohen, Union Equity Partners, and other plaintiffs appeal the district court’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of their claim against Yaeger Securities, Inc., Bob Stupak, Grand Casino Resorts, Inc., and other defendants, for violations of § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240 .10b-5.

*697 Cohen is the class representative of a group of investors (“Investor Class”) who attempted to purchase securities (“Units”) offered as part of an Initial Public Offering (“IPO”) of Stratosphere Corporation. Stratosphere was a defendant in district court and was a party to this appeal, but while the appeal was under submission, Stratosphere filed a Chapter 11 petition in bankruptcy and all further proceedings against it were stayed pursuant to the automatic stay provision of 11 U.S.C. 362(a). We therefore entered an order on April 9, 1997, staying all action in this appeal with regard to Stratosphere Corporation. The order also provided that for all other parties the appeal remained under submission. The automatic stay does not preclude us from deciding this appeal with regard to all parties other than Stratosphere, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.