United States v. Gila Valley Irrigation District

Good Law
117 F.3d 425·97 Daily Journal DAR 8438·1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 15898·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5193
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 30, 1997Nos. 96-16003, 96-16121, 96-16123, 96-16705 and 96-16140California310 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

This is the latest iteration of a lawsuit originally brought by the United States in 1925 “seeking a determination of the rights and priorities of Indians and non-Indians to the waters of the Gila River.” United States v. Gila Valley Irrigation Dist., 961 F.2d 1432 , 1433 (9th Cir.1992). The United States, acting on its own behalf and as trustee and guardian for the Pima and Apache Indians, negotiated a consent decree with private landowners that established the relative rights and obligations of Indian and non-Indian users of the Gila River. In 1935, the district court approved the Globe Equity Consent Decree, the meaning of which has been litigated ever since.

The parties appeal from the district court’s most recent decision in this case. See United States v. Gila Valley Irrigation Dist., 920 F.Supp. 1444 (D.Ariz.1996). The Gila River Indian Community (“GRIC”) and the San Carlos Apache Tribe appeal from the district court’s interpretation of Article VIII. GRIC also appeals from the district court’s decision concerning GRIC’s diversion rights at Gila Crossing. Finally, the private landowners, known as the Upper Valley Defendants (“UVDs”), appeal from the district court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.