Terry Lee Barker v. Marilyn Carr Susanne Ward Denise Randall

Good Law
66 F.3d 334·1995 WL 536343·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 31662
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 8, 199594-35028California720 words

Opinion

Opinion

66 F.3d 334 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Terry Lee BARKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Marilyn CARR; Susanne Ward; Denise Randall, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35028. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 16, 1995. * Decided Sept. 8, 1995. Before: ALARCON, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Oregon state prisoner Terry Lee Barker appeals pro se the district court's order granting judgment on the pleadings for defendants in Barker's action under 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1983 , 1985 and 1986. Barker alleged that defendants conspired to retaliate against him for bringing a civil rights lawsuit that sought to invalidate his conviction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Barker contends that the district court erred by granting judgment on the pleadings for defendants on his claims of discrimination and interference with access to the courts. This contention lacks merit. 4 "A judgment on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.