Father v. Boeing Co.

66 F.3d 334 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard M. FATHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The BOEING COMPANY; Seattle Professional Engineering Employees Association; Department of Social and Health Services of the State of Washington, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-35029. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 16, 1995. * Decided Sept. 8, 1995. Before: ALARCON, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Richard M. Father, a naturalized United States citizen born in Poland, appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment for defendants on his claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Secs. 2000e-2000e-17 ("Title VII"), and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. Secs. 12111-12117 ("ADA"). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 3 We have jurisdiction only over final orders of the district court. See 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . Without a Rule 54(b)…