Peter Louis Misquez Carreon v. William P. Barr, Attorney General, and G. Ruffennach L.A. Akers J.R. Dunne

66 F.3d 334 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Peter Louis Misquez CARREON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General, Defendant, and G. Ruffennach; L.A. Akers; J.R. Dunne, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-17203. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 5, 1995. * Decided Sept. 8, 1995. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arizona state prisoner Peter Louis Misquez Carreon appeals pro se the district court's denial of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion to reconsider the court's dismissal of his action brought against defendants under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 3 We review the denial of a Rule 60(b) motion for abuse of discretion. See Hammer v. Drago (In re Hammer), 940 F.2d 524, 525 (9th Cir.1991). 1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 4 "An appeal from a denial of a Rule 60(b) motion brings up only…