Montrose Chemical Corp. v. American Motorists Insurance

Good Law
117 F.3d 1128
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 30, 1997Nos. 96-55091 to 96-55097California4,090 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Magill, J.

The law firm of Latham & Watkins (La-tham & Watkins), on behalf of its client, Montrose Chemical Corporation of California (Montrose), brought seven causes of action against The Travelers Indemnity Company (Travelers), American Motorists Insurance Company (AMICO), and Insurance Company of North America (INA). In its complaints, Montrose alleged that Travelers, AMICO, and INA had in bad faith failed to defend Montrose against seven underlying environmental damages claims. The district court dismissed Montrose’s claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Travelers then brought a motion, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(c)(1)(A), seeking sanctions against Montrose. The district court granted Travelers’s motion and sanctioned Latham & Watkins. Montrose Chem. Corp. v. American Motorists Ins. Co., 926 F.Supp. 944, 947 (C.D.Cal.1995). Latham & Watkins appeals the district court’s imposition of sanctions. We reverse.

I.

Montrose is a Delaware corporation that used to manufacture, among other chemicals, the pesticide DDT. Montrose’s manufacturing operations were conducted primarily in California and Nevada. Although Montrose still owns a chemical facility in Nevada…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.