Phillip A. Luna v. Mary L. Helf, Trial Court Administrator Lane County District Attorney Lane County Theodore Kulongoski State of Oregon

66 F.3d 335 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Phillip A. LUNA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mary L. HELF, Trial Court Administrator; Lane County District Attorney; Lane County; Theodore Kulongoski; State of Oregon, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35933. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 16, 1995. * Decided Sept. 8, 1995. Before: ALARCON, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Phillip A. Luna, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendants in Luna's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action alleging defendants violated his constitutional rights by conspiring to deny him access to his grand jury records. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We may affirm the district court's decision on any grounds supported by the record. United States v. Washington, 969 F.2d 752, 755 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 1945 (1993). We review de novo the district court's grant of…