Richard David Parker v. Lee Conner

66 F.3d 335 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard David PARKER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Lee CONNER, Respondent-Appellee. No. 94-16816. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 5, 1995. * Decided Sept. 8, 1995. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Richard David Parker, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his Bivens action. He contends the district court erred when it construed his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 petition as a Bivens action and dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Parker filed this action as a 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 petition while incarcerated at FCI Safford, Arizona. He seeks injunctive relief for conditions of confinement which he contends impermissibly infringe on his right, and the right of others similarly situated, of access to the courts. He contends that in…