Daniel F. Piro v. National Transportation Safety Board
Opinion
Opinion
66 F.3d 335 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Daniel F. PIRO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD, Respondent. No. 94-70038. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 15, 1995. Decided Sept. 13, 1995. Before: FLETCHER, POOLE and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Petitioner Daniel F. Piro appeals an order of the National Transportation Safety Board ("NTSB") upholding the Federal Aviation Administration's ("FAA") emergency order revoking his commercial pilot certificate on the grounds that he was convicted for possessing cocaine for sale. Piro argues that the NTSB abused its discretion in affirming the revocation of his commercial pilot certificate because his drug offense was not aircraft-related. He also argues that the license revocation constitutes multiple punishment in violation of the Constitution's ban against double jeopardy. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 49 U.S.C. Sec. 1486 (a) (1988), and…