Moule Through Moule v. Paradise Valley Unified School Dist. No. 69

66 F.3d 335 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. A.J. MOULE, through his parents, James A. Moule & Kathleen A. Moule, husband and wife, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PARADISE VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 69, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona; the Paradise Valley Unified School District No. 69 Governing Board, Defendants-Appellants. No. 94-17021. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 10, 1995. Decided Sept. 1, 1995. Before: HALL, WIGGINS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 On the basis of Vernonia School Dist. 47J v. Acton, 115 S.Ct. 2386 (1995), we hold that the drug testing policy at issue in this case does not violate Appellees' rights under the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. 3 Appellees also sought relief under Article 2, Section 8 of the Arizona Constitution. Arizona courts have never interpreted that provision in relation to random drug testing. Because the parties assumed that the…