Jack Gerritsen v. City of Los Angeles Jerry Smart Coleman Security Service, Inc. Mark Banegas Bacerra Aguirre Mendoza Peel Dominguez Young William Vestal Kathy Herbert, Jack Gerritsen v. Worldwide Church God/ambassador College James Hadaway Jerry Smart Caroline Ascencio T. Holzer Santolla Dendy Trojan Security Services, Inc. Martin Renteria Eugenio Rodriguez-Cortez Jose Santoyo-Zendejas Rafel Araza Ashraf Farah, California Security Service, Inc. Benny Zavala Juan Castillo City of Los Angeles Board of Public Works Maureen A. Kendal Edward Longley Dave Torres Mike McKelvey City of Bell Rugroden Haooper Vasquez Espejo Cacheiro Owens Joe Cerilo Eduardo De Ibarrola
Opinion
Opinion
66 F.3d 335 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jack GERRITSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES; Jerry Smart; Coleman Security Service, Inc.; Mark Banegas; Bacerra Aguirre; Mendoza; Peel; Dominguez; Young; William Vestal; Kathy Herbert, Defendants-Appellees. Jack GERRITSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WORLDWIDE CHURCH GOD/AMBASSADOR COLLEGE; James Hadaway; Jerry Smart; Caroline Ascencio; T. Holzer; Santolla; Dendy; Trojan Security Services, Inc.; Martin Renteria; Eugenio Rodriguez-Cortez; Jose Santoyo-Zendejas; Rafel Araza; Ashraf Farah, California Security Service, Inc.; Benny Zavala; Juan Castillo; City of Los Angeles Board of Public Works; Maureen A. Kendal; Edward Longley; Dave Torres; Mike McKelvey; City of Bell; Rugroden; Haooper; Vasquez; Espejo; Cacheiro; Owens; Joe Cerilo; Eduardo de Ibarrola, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 94-56387, 94-56397. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 5, 1995. * Decided Sept. 14, 1995. Appeal…