Gallegos v. City of San Gabriel

66 F.3d 335 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Tobias GALLEGOS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN GABRIEL, Tom Dargan, Robert Clute, David Lawton, Dwight French, Homer Croy, Guy Deneshaud, James Castaneda, and Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55071. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 10, 1995. Decided Sept. 14, 1995. 1 Before: Hall and Leavy, Circuit Judges, and Hogan, * Chief District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Tobias Gallegos filed a complaint against the City of San Gabriel ("City") and certain named individuals under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 alleging that his constitutional rights were violated by the City and the individuals when they imposed and enforced zoning restrictions on his property. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the individual defendants based on qualified immunity. Further, the district court granted the City's motion during trial, pursuant to Rule 50 of the Federal Rules…