Guillermo Antonio Flores-Cruz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

66 F.3d 335 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Guillermo Antonio FLORES-CRUZ, et al., Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70929. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 11, 1995. * Decided Sept. 13, 1995. 1 Before: HALL and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and HOGAN, ** Chief District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Guillermo Antonio Flores-Cruz, his wife and their 24 year old son ("Flores family"), natives and citizens of Nicaragua, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") denial of their third motion to reopen immigration proceedings in order to apply for suspension of deportation, 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1254 (a)(1), and renew their applications for asylum, 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1158 (a), and withholding of deportation, 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1253 (h). 4 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1105(a). A decision by the BIA on an applicant's motion to reopen is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. INS v. Doherty,…