David C. Stephenson v. State of Washington Kitsap County Warren Sharpe Danny Clem Leonard W. Costello Leonard W. Kruse Ginger C. Grulur Jay Nuxall

66 F.3d 336 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. David C. STEPHENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON; Kitsap County; Warren Sharpe; Danny Clem; Leonard W. Costello; Leonard W. Kruse; Ginger C. Grulur; Jay Nuxall, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-35138. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 5, 1995. * Decided Sept. 8, 1995. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 David C. Stephenson appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action for failure to state a claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 3 A. Dismissal of Claims against Sharpe and Clem 4 Stephenson contends that the district court erred by concluding that defendants Sharpe and Clem, who were county prosecutors, were immune from suit under section 1983. This contention lacks merit. 5 Prosecutors are absolutely immune from suit for damages for conduct which is intimately associated…