Tammy L. Squire v. Casey, Gerry, Casey, Westbrook, Reed and Hughes, a California General Partnership Does I Through Xx, Inclusive

66 F.3d 336 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Tammy L. SQUIRE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CASEY, GERRY, CASEY, WESTBROOK, REED AND HUGHES, a California general partnership; Does I through XX, inclusive, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-55670. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 11, 1995. * Decided Sept. 13, 1995. Before: THOMPSON, LEAVY, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant Tammy L. Squire appeals pro se the jury's verdict in her action alleging she was terminated from her position as legal secretary based on her pregnancy and in retaliation for filing an EEOC complaint, in violation of 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e-5 et seq. 3 The appellant claims that the district court erred by failing to grant a continuance. The transcript of the hearing on the continuance, which occurred on November 10, 1992, shows that appellant was herself opposed to a continuance, despite the fact that her counsel had withdrawn and she had retained new…