United States v. Anthony David Chambers

66 F.3d 336 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony David CHAMBERS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50343. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 8, 1995. Decided Sept. 6, 1995. Before: THOMPSON, LEAVY, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Anthony David Chambers argues that the district court improperly increased his offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. Sec. 2B3.1(b)(3)(D) for inflicting bodily injury on his victim. 3 Chambers contends he was improperly denied a hearing on the causation of the victim's injuries. We reject this contention. Chambers was not denied a hearing on these issues, but rather the court denied his ex parte application for an order requiring subpoenas to be served on the victim and her treating medical professionals, as well as continuing the sentencing date and retaining a medical expert. The district court did consider the victim's trial testimony,…