Raymond C. Stokes v. John Kiethly McGuire Gleason Jurgenson Klein Taylor C.E. Noonan Ford Nacarato Swartz Jensen MacDonald Frazier Zabor Wood and Becker

66 F.3d 336 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Raymond C. STOKES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John KIETHLY; McGuire; Gleason; Jurgenson; Klein; Taylor; C.E. Noonan; Ford; Nacarato; Swartz; Jensen; MacDonald; Frazier; Zabor; Wood; and Becker, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35817. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 5, 1995. * Decided Sept. 14, 1995. Order Amending Memorandum and Denying Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Nov. 1, 1995. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Raymond C. Stokes, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's judgment for defendants, following a jury trial, on his excessive force claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 1 A. Limitation on Testimony 3 Stokes contends that the magistrate judge erred by limiting the testimony he was able to present at trial. 2 This contention lacks merit. 4 The magistrate judge may limit…