United States v. Jeanne Manarite

66 F.3d 336 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeanne MANARITE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10126. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 5, 1995. * Decided Sept. 8, 1995. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jeanne Manarite appeals pro se the district court's denial of her Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e) motion for return of $2,400 seized from her residence by the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") under 21 U.S.C. Sec. 881 . 1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Manarite contends that the district court erred by ruling that she received adequate notice of the seizure, and thus was not entitled to equitable relief. This contention lacks merit. 4 A district court may consider a claim for equitable relief where the claimant challenges the adequacy of notice of the seizure. United States v. Clagett, 3 F.3d 1355, 1356 (9th…