United States v. Antonio Martinez, United States of America v. Augustin Nava, United States of America v. Alan Clark, United States of America v. Jose Manuel Limon-Uriarte

66 F.3d 336 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Augustin NAVA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alan CLARK, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Manuel LIMON-URIARTE, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 94-30258, 94-30294, 94-30366, 94-30402. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 7, 1995. Decided Aug. 31, 1995. Before: WRIGHT, BEEZER and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Antonio Martinez, Augustin Nava, Alan Clark and Jose Manuel Limon-Uriarte appeal their convictions and/or sentences under the United States Sentencing Guidelines ("U.S.S.G.") for conspiracy to distribute cocaine (all defendants), and distribution of cocaine (Martinez only), in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 and 846. Martinez and Clark were convicted by…