Martinez-Villareal

Martinez-Villareal v. Stewart

Good Law
118 F.3d 625·97 Daily Journal DAR 6398·1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 11950·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4584
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 1997Nos. 97-80229, 94-99011 and 94-99012California1,640 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Ramon Martinez-Villareal moves this court for, inter alia, a stay of execution and leave to file a subsequent petition in district court. For the reason explained below, we stay the execution and order further briefing.

I

Background

Martinez-Villareal was convicted of murder in Arizona and his conviction and sentence of death were upheld by the Arizona Supreme Court. State v. Martinez-Villareal, 145 Ariz. 441 , 702 P.2d 670 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. 975 , 106 S.Ct. 339 , 88 L.Ed.2d 324 (1985). Martinez-Villareal was thereafter unsuccessful in several State post-conviction relief petitions, and we denied relief in Martinez-Villareal v. Lewis, 80 F.3d 1301 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 588 , 136 L.Ed.2d 517 (1996). In that deci *626 sion, we specifically held that Martinez-Villa-real’s claim that he was incompetent to be executed was premature. Id. at 1309, n. 1.

Martinez-Villareal returned to the courts of Arizona in February, 1997, by filing a “Motion Pursuant to ARS § 13-4022.” Arizona’s statutory scheme, as embodied in that section, authorizes the superior court to appoint experts and hold a hearing concerning a condemned prisoner’s competence to be executed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.