United States v. Keith Kim

66 F.3d 336 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Keith KIM, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-56423. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 5, 1995. * Decided Sept. 14, 1995. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Keith Kim, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion. He contends the district court erred when it denied his motion to vacate his sentence because the district court's drug quantity calculation was based on multiple hearsay. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 . After accepting the district court's factual findings unless clearly erroneous and reviewing its conclusions of law de novo, Doganiere v. United States, 914 F.2d 165, 167 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 940 (1991), we affirm. 3 At trial, a DEA agent testified that Korean authorities seized 20 kilograms of a total…