United States v. Mario Zamora Moya

66 F.3d 337 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario Zamora MOYA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10341. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 14, 1995. Decided Sept. 8, 1995. 1 Before: D.W. NELSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and KING, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Defendant Mario Zamora Moya ("Moya") appeals from a conviction for conspiracy to distribute cocaine and possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 (a)(1) and 846. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 4 Defendant Moya claims that the Government failed to introduce sufficient evidence at trial to permit a rational trier of fact to find each of the elements of the conspiracy and possession with intent to distribute charges beyond a reasonable doubt. With respect to the conspiracy count, Moya contends the Government failed to show he was actually a member of…