United States v. Brian Ray Noyes

66 F.3d 337 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brian Ray NOYES, Defendant-Appellant, No. 95-30086. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 16, 1995. * Decided Sept. 8, 1995. Before: ALARCON, FERNANDEZ and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Brian Ray Noyes appeals his guilty plea conviction for possession with intent to deliver methamphetamine, carrying a firearm during a drug trafficking crime, and possession of a firearm by a previously convicted felon. Noyes contends the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress jailhouse comments made by his co-defendant and the testimony of police officers who followed Noyes to the methamphetamine. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1291, and we affirm. 3 A defendant who voluntarily and knowingly pleads guilty waives claims of constitutional violations that occurred prior to the entry of the guilty plea. See Tollett v. Henderson,…