United States v. Minh Truong

66 F.3d 337 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Minh TRUONG, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50366. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 12, 1995. * Decided Sept. 13, 1995. 1 Before: HALL and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and HOGAN, ** Chief District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Minh Truong appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines and the order imposing restitution, imposed following his guilty plea to aiding and abetting the embezzlement of mail containing credit cards, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 2 and 1709. 4 Truong contends that the district court did not adhere to the specifications of Rule 32 of the Federal Rules of Criminal procedure when, pursuant to Truong's objection to the treatment of uncharged conduct as relevant conduct, the district court failed to make specific factual findings. Truong objected to the recommendation in the presentence report ("PSR") that the $10,985.27…