United States v. Aron Dwayne Versteeg

66 F.3d 337 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Aron Dwayne VERSTEEG, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-30399. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 5, 1995. * Decided Sept. 8, 1995. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Aron Dwayne Versteeg appeals his conviction, which followed his conditional plea of guilty to manufacturing marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1). Versteeg argues that the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress statements he made after his arrest and evidence seized from his home pursuant to an invalid search warrant. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the question of police coercion. Derrick v. Peterson, 924 F.2d 813, 823 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 853 (1991). We review for clear error the district court's conclusion that the suspect made a knowing…