United States v. Charles Elton Watson

66 F.3d 337 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Charles Elton WATSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10354. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 10, 1995. Decided Sept. 6, 1995. 1 Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, and FITZGERALD * , District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Charles Elton Watson appeals his conviction following a jury trial for armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113 (a) & (d). Watson contends the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress statements made to an FBI agent while released on bail after being questioned by local police and invoking his right to an attorney. Watson also contends the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress voice identification evidence because the pre-trial lineup was unduly suggestive. I. 4 On September 27, 1993 at approximately 11:15 a.m., the California Republic Bank in Greenfield,…