United States v. Nolberto Vasquez

Good Law
66 F.3d 337·1995 WL 542754·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 31732
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 13, 199594-50507California762 words

Opinion

Opinion

66 F.3d 337 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nolberto VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50507. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 10, 1995. * Decided Sept. 13, 1995. 1 Before: HALL and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and HOGAN, ** Chief District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Nolberto Vasquez appeals the district court's order revoking his supervised release in CR-88-0932-B, bank robbery, imposing an 11 month custodial term, and recommencing his supervised release term in CR-89-1165-B, bail jumping, following his release on the 11 month bank robbery term. He contends that, upon revocation of his supervised release, the district court imposed both a term of incarceration and a term of supervised release, which is prohibited in this Circuit. United States v. Behnezhad, 907 F.2d 896 (9th Cir.1990). See also 18 U.S.C. Secs. 3583 (e)(2) and (3). 4 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.