United States v. Clarence O. Okoro

66 F.3d 337 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clarence O. OKORO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50458. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 17, 1995. * Decided Aug. 31, 1995. Before: CHOY, SNEED, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Clarence Okoro appeals his sentence after pleading guilty to conspiracy to commit mail fraud, mail fraud, fraudulent use of access devices, fraudulent possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, and money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 371 , 1341, 1029(a)(2), 1029(a)(3), and 1956(a)(1)(A)(i). Okoro contends the district court erred when, pursuant to the Sentencing Guidelines Sec. 3B1.1(c), it increased his offense level for "managing or supervising" criminal activity. Okoro argues that: (1) the district court failed to make a finding of fact that he managed or supervised any criminally responsible person, (2) the evidence…