Sabelko

Sabelko v. City of Phoenix

Good Law
120 F.3d 161·97 Daily Journal DAR 8990·1997 WL 386080·1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 17501·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5531
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 14, 1997No. 94-15495California1,818 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Beezer, J.

ORDER

The opinion filed on October 19, 1995 is hereby withdrawn.

OPINION

We reconsider whether a City of Phoenix ordinance which imposes a “floating buffer zone” restriction upon demonstrators outside of health care facilities violates the First Amendment. We affirm the district court’s decision declaring the Phoenix ordinance unconstitutional and enjoining its enforcement.

I

In 1993, the City of Phoenix, Arizona enacted an ordinance limiting demonstration activity near health care facilities due to concern about harassment outside such facilities. The ordinance makes it unlawful “for any person, in the course of demonstration aetivi *163 ty within the access area of a health care facility, to fail to withdraw upon a clearly communicated request to do so to a distance of at least eight (8) feet away from any person who has made the request.”

Plaintiffs-Appellees Katherine Sabelko and Nancy Barto refer to themselves as “sidewalk counselors” who engage in demonstration activity outside abortion clinics in Phoenix. The plaintiffs filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action in district court seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against the City of Phoenix on the grounds that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.