Ramos-Oseguera

United States v. Ramos-Oseguera

Caution
120 F.3d 1028·97 Daily Journal DAR 9887·1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 19738·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6013
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 30, 1997Nos. 95-10386, 95-10478, 95-10535, 95-10491 and 95-10498California6,142 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Boochever, J.

Julio Ramos-Oseguera (Ramos) and Sote-ro Ramos-Oseguera (Sotero) were convicted of a conspiracy to sell heroin in addition to many individual counts of heroin sales. Ramos was also convicted of Continuing Criminal Enterprise (CCE). At that same trial, Roberto Ramirez (Ramirez) was convicted of a single count of possession of heroin with intent to sell, and Samuel Robles-Lopez (Robles) was convicted of two counts of possessing and distributing heroin. Ramirez and Robles were both acquitted of the conspiracy charge.

Prior to the Ramos trial, Ramos’s wife, Maria Reyes-Sandoval (Reyes), was tried separately. She raised a duress defense, asserting that Ramos had physically and psychologically abused her and forced her to participate in the heroin distribution. She admitted many acts and was acquitted of conspiracy but convicted of several individual counts of heroin distribution. Her appeal has been consolidated with those of the other appellants.

BACKGROUND

A. The Heroin Organization

Appellants Ramos, Sotero, Ramirez, and Robles pleaded not guilty to multiple heroin *1032 distribution offenses and carrying firearms in relation to a drug trafficking crime. Ramos also pleaded not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.