Artero

United States v. Artero

Good Law
121 F.3d 1256·97 Daily Journal DAR 9935·1997 WL 426210·1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 19766·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6052
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 31, 1997No. 95-50079California3,749 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kleinfeld, J.

This case raises two trial issues: (1) the instructions on “beyond a reasonable doubt” and on lost evidence, and (2) ethnic composition of the grand jury.

I. FACTS

Artero was convicted of smuggling marijuana across the Tijuana-San Diego border in his gas tank (importation in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960, and possession with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1)).

Artero was driving into the United States from Mexico. The initial inspector at U.S. Customs thought the car was too clean and lacking in personal effects, so he directed Artero to a secondary inspection. When the inspectors had Artero open the trunk, they saw a full plastic gasoline container, which was very unusual. The inspector asked why, and Artero’s answer, that the gas in Mexico was bad, seemed strange. So the inspector looked at the gas tank under the car, which also looked too clean, cleaner than the rest of the underside of the ear. The narcotics dog scratched at the back of the car, and the gas tank sounded solid instead of hollow. An inspector tried to drive the car to the service station where they routinely remove gas tanks, but it ran out of gas, though the gas gauge was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.