Lopez-Smith

Lopez-Smith v. Hood

Good Law
121 F.3d 1322·97 Daily Journal DAR 10399·1997 WL 450661·1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 21140·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6369
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 11, 1997No. 96-17091California2,539 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kleinfeld, J.

This case raises several issues of the law of extradition. Most notably, the question arises whether mental deficiencies which would render a person incapable of standing trial entitle him to deferral of extradition.

FACTS

Mexico sought extradition of Lopez-Smith, for murder. Magistrate Judge Raymond Terlizzi, after careful consideration, certified that he was extraditable. Lopez-Smith was charged with murder in Mexico. A warrant for his arrest was issued by a Mexican court. Evidence before the magistrate established probable cause to believe that Lopez-Smith had indeed committed the murders.

*1324 Lopez-Smith petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus on the grounds that (1) Lopez-Smith was incompetent to undergo extradition proceedings because of mental deficiencies; (2) the magistrate judge had refused to consider evidence addressing whether the United States ought to exercise its discretion to extradite; (3) Lopez-Smith had offered evidence of official corruption relating to Lopez-Smith’s case. The district judge denied the writ, and Lopez-Smith appeals.

The accusation against Lopez-Smith is that he drove from Douglas, Arizona, to Tucson, Arizona, and bought a .45 Colt…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.